If a person gets pregnant, that’s their business, but killing it with no risk to their well-being is wrong, in my opinion. Especially when adoption is always an option.

But if the child was no harm to the woman’s well-being, I feel the government should pay for the medical bills. A woman should not have to pay for a child she doesn’t want.

I wouldn’t mind my tax-dollars going towards methods to prevent unplanned pregnancies, but no matter what, there will still be rape, sadly. A woman should be able to get rid of the child, even if I don’t agree with killing it, and would prefer a woman to put the child up for adoption, they should still be able to choose what’s right for themselves, after all, I wouldn’t know what it would be like unless I was in her place.

I guess my opinion is based on the situation. I feel a woman should be capable of affordably preventing an unwanted pregnancy, and even if that were to fail, or if they were raped, to be able to be rid of the child within a reasonable time of finding out. If they were to wait until, say, the second/thrid trimester, that, I feel, is unacceptable, because adoption is always there as an option.
Meh, the ramblings of me. [o.O;"]

Of course, it’s easy for me to say that, since it’s not my body being mutilated.