M. Varn Chandola
rightlegalhelp.net

THAT’S TRUE THAT MOST OF THE HUMANS IN THE WORLD ARE NON – VEGGYS
BUT THAT’S NOT THEIR FAULT
DUE TO CLIMATIC CONDITIONS AND LACK OF VEGETATION THEY HAVE TO ACCEPT IT ON NAME OF LIVING BO RELIGION ,ETC.
IF THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN A SOCIETY WITH LUMPSOME FUNDS THEN, WE WOULD HAVE SPREADED GOOD EDU , TEACHINGS, PROVIDING VEG MEAL TO ALL PEOPLE WITHOUT DISCRIMINATION AND PROMOTING VEGANISM.

I AM IN UR FULL SUPPORT IF I COULD FIRST EFFORT MYSELF FOR ANIMAL RIGHTS

I ALSO EAT A VEGANIAN DIET ON THE NAME OF RELIGION HINDUISM.

THOUGH I BELIEVE THAT WHEN AN ANIMAL HUNTS IT IS NOT BAD BECAUSE IT IS FOR NATURAL BALANCING.
BUT ITS TRUE THAT WE HUMANS SHOULD NOT KILL OTHER CREATIONS ON THE NAME OF FOOD CHAIN BECAUSE:
1. MOST PEOPLE EAT COOKED MEAT, WHILE NATURALLY ANIMALS OF PREY EAT RAW;
2. IF WE DONT WANT TO BE HUNTED AND WE CONSIDER THAT AN ANIMAL WHO HAS EATEN A MAN SHOULD BE KILLED BECAUSE IT IS NOW HARMFUL FOR THE HUMAN SOCIETY SO THE SAME WE SHOULD NOT DO IT WITH THE ANIMALS, BECAUSE HUMANS WERE ALSO ONCE UNDER THE DIET OF MANY ANIMALS LIKE BEAR, LIONS, ETC.
IN SHORT IF WE CONSIDER OUR LIVES PRECIOUS, SO SHOULD WE WORTH THE LIVES OF OTHER CREATURES.

IN YOUR SUPPORT,

ABHISHEK PANDIT

How unfair and condescending is this:

When humans face the death penalty, that means they are guilty of a horrible crime, and execution is to be their punishment (in the eyes of the law); and then on the other hand when a nonhuman animal is facing the death penalty (slaughter), they are completely innocent, they are NOT guilty of a horrible crime. However we have taken upon ourselves to punish them for what? For being them? For being the precious, loving, feeling souls that they are? They have done nothing wrong to deserve that “punishment”. So why do we continue to take it upon ourselves to slaughter innocent animals? And in such a cruel, horrific way at that? **Sigh**

It’s frusturating.